Below is a growing list of documents and other resources being collected for our research and investigative reports. As we continue to gather more evidence, new documents will be added to provide transparency and insight.
Description: Protecting free software against confusing additional restrictions
Description: Neo4j GlassDoor Reviews ordered by newest first.
Below are links to external sites and resources that are relevant to our research and investigative reports.
Description: 2024-2025 Appeal related to Neo4j, Inc. v. PureThink, LLC (5:18-cv-07182)
Description: Direct Examination of Mike Asher, CFO of Neo4j
Description: Page 24, #14 - Fraud accusations against Neo4j
14. Truth And Information Provided To Those Who Had
Reason To Know
Mr. Suhy’s statements were truthful and were his opinions based on
the statements made by plaintiffs and the implications if they were
properly remedied by law enforcement and investors. The statement
were made to people who had reason to know the information and
Suhy had no information his statements were false when made. Neo4J
USA has told the US government they could not use the open source
version when they know that position is false. Lying to the US
government on such a material issue is a fraud and a crime.
Neo4j
USA told Suhy to change a transaction from a support deal to a license
deal. It was Suhy’s understanding this was to improperly over state
revenues in financials for potential investors. A license fee is generally
booked as earned when made while support fees are earned over time.
This would be a fraud, claiming support fees as license fees, on
investors leading to potential criminal actions and shareholder suits if
the authorities or investors found out and did something about it.